How we work
Building on existing evidence, we apply qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches to answer the toughest questions.
We support clients to improve
effectiveness and outcomes, maximize impact, and drive the intersection between strategy and policy.
Our network includes experts in public health impact and outcomes research, product development and introduction, performance management, evaluation and advocacy.
Based in New York, with representation in New Delhi, Carces, and Lisbon, the practice draws on experts from around the world.
What we do
Spark Street has contributed to the COVID response by providing pro-bono support to the City and State of New York, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, the World Bank, the Global Fund to Fight Aids, TB and Malaria, Gavi, Pfizer, the Peterson Institute, CHAP Health, UNU-IIGH, Unicef, WHO as well as government and professional colleagues from around the world to help analyze data, interpret evidence and share learning. We have also volunteered in our own local communities on issues ranging from school and arts reopening to the production of hand sanitizer. Spark Street thought pieces have been published by the Council of Foreign Relations, the World Economic Forum, the Conversation, the Lancet, Atlantic Magazine and the British Medical Journal. We have been interviewed by NPR, CNN, the Economist, the New York Times, Al Jazeera, Axios news, and New York's Our Town:.
Our clients are organizations working in health and global development that aspire to significantly impact the systems in which they operate.
Not for profit and intergovernmental organizations
Principal | New York
Nina founded Spark Street in 2016. She has held numerous leadership positions including as Managing Director for Policy and Performance at Gavi, the vaccine alliance, where she led Gavi’s work in strategic planning, policy development, market-shaping, performance management, and monitoring and evaluation. She also served as the principal advisor and acting chief of health at Unicef, overseeing their health programs in over 150 countries.
Nina led the Policy team at Global Alliance for Tuberculosis Drug Development, where she focused on market access, product introduction and advocacy. She directed the global public health program for the Open Society Foundation and has worked for the Population Council and AVSC International (now Engender Health). She holds degrees from Harvard and Columbia Universities and teaches on the faculty at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. She is a lifetime member of the Council on Foreign Relations and currently serves as a Principal Visiting Fellow at the United Nations International Institute for Global Health. She also chairs Gavi's Evaluation Advisory Committee and co-leads WHO's Research Network on COVID in educational institutions.
Susanna focuses on results-based program development, strategic planning, and analysis.
She has held positions with UNICEF in country and at headquarters and worked in maternal and child health in Finland and India.
Anna-Carin is a health policy and health system specialist. She started her career at the Swedish Ministry of Health and has served as a senior policy advisor to the Ministries of Health in Kenya and Zambia. Anna-Carin has managed the implementation of health programmes for Swedish Sida, the German GIZ, the European Union (EU) and the World Health Organisation (WHO). At Gavi, she worked on policy development and evaluation, including
developing Gavi's fragility and emergency, gender and risk policies. Anna-Carin holds a MSc in Health and Pharmaco- Economics and a BSc in Macro Economics. Anna-Carin is fluent in Swedish and English and has a working knowledge of French.
Susanna holds a BA in Social Sciences and an MA in Public Health from Tampere University, Finland. She also has an MA in Russian and Eurasian Studies from European University in St. Petersburg and in addition to Finnish, is fluent in English and Russian.
As the volume of public health data expands and data are more interconnected, a broad range of data is being used to support research and inform global health policies and practice. We expand on an existing framework to provide a classification of data into four broad archetypes patient data, health systems data, routine public health data, and health research data. It should be noted that this categorization is used to describe how these data are generated and not necessarily their application or use.
Nina Schwalbe, Brian Wahl, Jingyi Song, Susanna Lehtimaki